"In lulz we trust"? LAME!
While 4chan users made childish and disgusting posts, ED users just didn't give a damn at all. That's right, the site is much similar to Wikipedia, but it's different that it only focuses on extremely liberal, vulgar and trollish opinions. It may sound too much, but it is indeed that sick. Common themes, include: homophobia, racism, sexism, and just about anything totally ignorant. On the other hand, the site is said to be well moderated, and that most site users do not take the content seriously.
Since I already made that 4chan post, I have really nothing else to say other than it can be a fun site for hot-headed or bored people.
Here's some pics in comparing Wiki and ED's definition os a similar term. You be the judge. Enjoy!
Wikipedia's definition of God.
ED's definition of God.
__________________________
Wikipedia's definition of Apple.
ED's definition of Apple.
__________________________
Wikipedia's definition of Facebook.
ED's definition of Facebook.
No comments:
Post a Comment